A couple of weeks ago I attended a meeting of the Citizens’
group at New North London Synagogue. The
group is affiliated to Citizens UK, Britain’s largest broad-based community
organising network which has close to 300 institutions in membership, ranging
from mosques and churches to schools and student unions – and, more recently,
synagogues.
Community organising focuses on issues which emerge out of
the broad self-interest of community members.
Self-interest doesn’t mean selfishness – you can have an interest in an
issue which benefits other people. The
important point is that the issues we think are supposed to concern us on
ideological grounds very often fail to motivate to take action. We’re too busy and we just don’t care enough,
however much we think we should.
The idea behind self-interest is to build the habits of good
citizenship and collective action by tapping into the issues which genuinely
motivate people because they have something at stake. Citizens’ Living Wage campaign was started by
members of Citizens-affiliated churches in East London who had no time to spend
with their families because they were working two or more jobs. City Safe was initiated by families who had
lost their children to street violence.
But while Citizens have been remarkably successful at
identifying issues and building a campaigning network in disadvantaged areas of
the capital, organising in the synagogue has proved in some ways a tougher
challenge. Last year, we conducted a
listening campaign at New North London synagogue with the aim of identifying
issues that connected with our self-interest.
While problems definitely came up – notably the problem of bad
conditions in care homes where many of our members’ elderly parents live –
nothing seemed to spark the kind of passion needed to generate leadership and
kick-start a campaign.
Some people think that as largely middle-class
suburb-dwellers, our lives are simply too comfortable. I think this prejudges the issue – the Jewish
community is far more diverse than we think and the fact that disadvantaged
people are less visible doesn’t mean they don’t exist. Their invisibility could well be a symptom of
their marginalisation. But it also seems
to me that maybe we just haven’t managed to articulate our issues
properly. So, while genuine issues need
to emerge from our members, here’s a quick list of things I’d be prepared to do
something about - and I bet other members of the Jewish community would too.
1. The pay gap and time poverty – yesterday’s Observer had a
story about bankers’ (anonymous) responses to the proposed EU cap on bonuses. Most seemed unfazed, saying that anyone who
was affected would move into hedge funds or private equity, or that the banks
would find a way around the cap. They
also said that a net pay cut of say £50k would be unlikely to make anyone with
a seven-figure salary and a family actually relocate to avoid it. Another article exposed the scandal of
growing numbers of women being squeezed out or made redundant after takingmaternity leave. The same paper’s editorial today focused on the ways new technology is changing the economy and
society. The bottom line was that more
automation means fewer jobs but that ultimately unemployment will reduce demand
and bring the economy to a halt. It’s
striking how few people point out the connection between rising pay inequality,
unemployment and time poverty – ironically among the rich. I remember reading in the 80s that advancing
technology would create more wealth with less labour and would force us to
consider how to spend increasing amounts of leisure time. What’s actually happened is that working
hours and inequality have both expanded, leaving us (and that includes the
wealthy) busier and less happy than before.
Working to bring about a change of culture and employment practices to
encourage part time and flexible employment could be a powerful issue for
time-poor middle class families.
2. Schools – lots of people I know are nearly hysterical
about getting their kids into the right schools. Successive governments have emphasised choice
and competition in education, rather than providing good neighbourhood schools
for all. Most schools operate
distance-based admissions policies and this has created not only a post-code
lottery, but effectively a system of selection based on who can afford to live
near good schools. This affects reasonably
well-off families who can’t afford million pound houses as much as disadvantaged
ones. While we might not be able to take
on the entire education system, what would happen if we campaigned for
non-distance based admissions policies (such as that recently adopted by the
new Alma primary school in Finchley), thus disconnecting the right to education
from the property market and breaking the circle between rising house prices
and improving educational standards?
3. Parking – everyone hates parking restrictions in boroughs
like Barnet, seeing them as a council-owned racket for making money out of
motorists. But parking policy also
impacts on shopkeepers and the local economy.
At a time when suburban high streets have taken on look made up of
betting shops, payday loan shops, charity shops and boarded up storefronts, parking
is not only an issue which affects everyone and could motivate them to get
involved, but could also play a significant role in regenerating local
economies and communities.
4. Community relationships – for many Jews, a real piece of
self-interest is in building relationships with members of other
communities. Connecting synagogues with
local churches, mosques and schools, welcoming their members in to our
communities, visiting their and working on projects of common interest in
inherently interesting and worthwhile. Whatever
other issues we choose, by working on them in partnership with others, we can find
ourselves a constructive place as Jews in British society and begin to make our
community more open-minded, outward looking and values-focused.
What other issues should we be taking on? I’d love to hear feedback via Twitter:
@MattPlen.
No comments:
Post a Comment